Doris Kraus

Doris Kraus

Biography

Dr. Kraus received her Ph.D. in zoology from Rutgers University.  For over 20 years she has been a freelance science and medical writer and editor, for both technical and lay audiences.  Dr. Kraus has contributed to several books, has written for a variety of media including educational publishing, newspapers and radio, and has consulted for public television.  She received an American Medical Writers Association award for a newspaper series on Alzheimers Disease.

Author of the chapter(s):
Other Invertebrates
Fishes, Amphibians, and Reptiles
Birds and Mammals
From Populations to the Biosphere
Environmental Problems
Featured Chapter
cover_chapterChemistry - Kinetic Molecular Theory
by Richard Parsons

This chapter describes the molecular structure and properties of gases and develops both the combined gas law and the universal gas law. The stoichiometry of reactions involving gases is also covered.


»View the Chapter
Featured Author
Doris Kraus

Dr. Kraus received her Ph.D. in zoology from Rutgers University.  For over 20 years she has been a freelance science and medical writer and editor, for both technical and lay audiences.  Dr. Kraus has contributed to several books, has written for a variety of media including educational publishing, newspapers and radio, and has consulted for public television.

View Profile | View All Authors
hd_partners.jpg
Is there a purpose for Education?
Written by Neeru Khosla   
Monday, 19 October 2009 05:45
Education
I had the privilege of presenting at the Gifted Education Conference organized by the Nueva School.  The theme of the conference was not only Gifted Education but also Innovation (for example role of design process in K-12 Education, Social-Emotional Learning) and professional development for teachers.  To complete the holistic nature of education, the conference extended their reach to include students as shown by the inclusion of a 15-year-old student who had started his own company that sold a card game he had invented.  The concept of this game was based on concepts in chemistry similar to the popular card game Magic.  780 teachers, parents, and school administrates attented this very informative and stimulating conference.
I was asked to be on a panel focusing on "What 21st Century Education will look like." Surprisingly, not one of us came up with a similar answer, especially since the work in education focus is different.  As expected, my response based on customized and individualize education.  The essence of my point of view is that we must ensure that we must meet the needs of the students starting from where they are rather then where we expect them to be.  The second person on the panel focuse on Emotional Quotient (EQ), Culture Quotient (CQ) and Intelligence Quotient (IQ).  Based on his own eperience in education the next panelist felt that he was taught to be "adaptable to changing situations" and hence we should be teaching for adaptability.  The final panelist, however, based on his research and experience felt that the focus should be on ethical education.

Hearing these responses I thought really these are four divergent responses begging the questions:
"What is the purpose of education?"
and
"What is the role of schools?"
fotolia_11984231_xs

No doubt that each of my more distinuished fellow panelist brought a very important and much needed angle to education.  However, the  bottom-line is that there are only so many hours in a day.  What do we include and what do we take out?  Are we requiring our schools and teachers to de facto become the "family unit"?  Are we requiring our schools to be everything to everyone?  Can we continue to do so while taking care of very diverse, in many ways, population?

How do we ensure that schools teach to learning the essentials of academics, while making sure that we allow time for complex, individual and ever changing emotional and humane characteristics? Any thoughts?

 

Comments  

 
+1 # Matt Montagne 2009-10-30 07:56 I enjoyed participating in your session on CK-12 and the many other excellent sessions at the conference last week. Your post title is interesting and will continue to be the point of debate in a learning economy where information is abundant, networked, and digital. The contemporary learning economy is quite disruptive to the traditional model of education. My simple answer to the question is that the purpose of education is to empower individuals to be the best that they can be. It is no longer enough for students to only show content mastery on an isolated test for one audience member (the teacher). If we're going to empower students be the best that they can be then we're going to have to orchestrate opportunities for them to apply their knowledge in a variety of authentic and meaningful ways (eg-like contributing content and materials to for various CK-12 Flexbooks). Ted Sizer, who recently passed away, talked about creating opportunities for students to engage in exhibitions of mastery that let them show their understanding. Let's begin the work of orchestrating opportunities for youth to engage in real, meaningful work that has the potential for an impact right now. Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Neeru Khosla 2009-11-11 16:11 I completely agree with you Matt. Without purpose to education we will not have engagement. There needs to be "passion with purpose." I am a deep believer of intersection of purpose and passion. When there is this intersection engagement and effort follow. Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh